May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a good alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, that was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows you to put it into your mouth, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher it is also in violation of the law. The reason being that while there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to utilize to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there podsmall.com is currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.
Along with the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes in the marketplace could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to add warning labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which implies that fewer people will purchase them.